![]() | ![]() | |
![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Master Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 760
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Question about photosynthesis
Does anybody know whether or not ultraviolet light has an adverse effect (or any effect at all) on photosynthesis? If, for example, a mega-thick cloud rolled over someplace and blocked out the sunlight (the light and the UV and everything), would all the plantlife in that area die?
I'm not planning world domination, by the way, I'm doing research for a story. Wikipedia is being an asshole and the articles I can find on the subject are twenty feet over my head. A simple yes or no would be amazing. Thanks! Fred |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Can derail any thread
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Portland, ME
Posts: 1,932
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Plants usually have pigments that protect them from UV light since it causes damage to them, just like in us.
edit: Here's something short and pretty easy: http://www2.mcdaniel.edu/Biology/bot.../l2inature.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Master Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 760
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thank you very much sir.
Fred |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Not for your amusement
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nega-Earth
Posts: 22,083
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wait, what does UV light have to do with a mega-cloud blocking light? And for the record, yes, if the cloud stayed in that same area long enough, it could kill the plant life. (First they would go into winter 'withdrawal', then eventually it would die if it couldn't get light after awhile.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
Master Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 760
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
The whole idea sort of came to me in one of those 5am moments of eureka where you're still half asleep, so a few parts of it still don't make too much sense (the armless psychology teacher being one of them). Quote:
Thanks kind sir Fred |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
AKA Beefpipe
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Whitby, Ontario
Posts: 229
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Maybe off topic?
I remember an interesting experiment from high school, that displays the effect of no sunlight vividly: Fold a strip of aluminum foil over a segment of a leaf (of some potted plant). Leave it for a week, and then remove the strip of foil. I remember that the rest of the leaf was still green, while the part that had been beneath the strip had lost much of its colour. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Oh come on!!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: DC
Posts: 4,128
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Good luck with the Weather Dominator or whatever the fuck you're up to Fred!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Master Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 760
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
. . . and thanks
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Not for your amusement
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nega-Earth
Posts: 22,083
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Common cold fusion
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: On the mighty Cumberland
Posts: 5,136
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As said, if all light were blocked out by a cloud UV would not be high on the plants' list of current issues. However:
UV degrades proteins, including photosystems I and II. All photosynthesizing plants expend considerable energy repairing these systems as part of normal operation, but plants in areas with higher-than-normal UV exposure, as deserts and high mountains, often have special adaptations. Many such plants have very thick waxy cuticles or hairs to filter UV as well as limit water loss, while some turn or fold the leaves during mid-day to reduce surface area exposed to radiation. Sudden increase in UV levels will overwhelm plants' defenses and lead, depending on level, to reduced photosyntheitic capacity and increased energy expenditure due to photosystem damage, or to more fundamental damage to cellular structures and genetic material. Plants are less susceptible to cancers than are animals, but sufficient genetic damage is still lethal. UV is dangerous stuff. We use it in bacterial chambers and aquaria as a sterilizer- more effective than bleach! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Master Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 760
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Interesting stuff. But isn't UV super powerful, so, for example, you can still get a bitchin' sunburn on a cloudy day? Like if there was a cloud that blocked out the kind of light that the plants used for photosynthesis could the UV still get through? And if it could still get through, with the plants only getting the UV instead of the UV and the "good" sunlight, would they wither and whatnot that much faster?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Common cold fusion
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: On the mighty Cumberland
Posts: 5,136
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
UV does penetrate clouds better than does visible light, though it is still partially blocked. So the plants would simply still be facing the normal constant threat of UV radiation while not being exposed to useable radiation. The UV would be a minor factor in comparison to the lack of PAR (photosynthetically active radiation) and the probable lowering of temperature associated with constant cloud cover.
Look up 'nuclear winter' and 'K-T event' for more information on the probable effects of massive clouds on plant life. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Master Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 760
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Will do.
Thanks for all responses! Cobra Commander will be so proud! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|